It's payback time. But before I name the winner, I would like to express its opinion on the combined interviews.
1 ). bbstar. in. ua.
I do not like when I make a representation of the ' shark business '. A healthy share of pathos in the representation does not hurt, but it is very easy to go too far. So, if you think it ironic idea will not work, it is better to confine ourselves to a more restrained phrases describing the interlocutor.
Otherwise, it is quite well-knit interviews from the category of those that I call a special. Half of the questions on the hiring and supervision of remote workers, the second - about startups. Not bad, but in such interviews are rarely save lives, they are more like profiles, and interesting for the most part only those who are familiar with the topic of discussion. But there is great danger that you are nothing new for them to their interview did not say.
Total, about 5 out of 10. Soundly, but rather dry.
2 ). seo4ski. biz.
The main problem and the main plus of the same interview - secondary. There was virtually no issues that I had not asked. On the other hand it is the proximity of these issues to the reading audience and makes it interesting: you seemed to try on a sweater, which was used - it is a warm, cozy home and a.
But how responsible I was extremely hard to find in these matters is something else that I did not say earlier. And still the interviewee must feel comfortable answering questions.
Total, about 7 out of 10. Nothing new, I did not say that the interview.
3 ). colibrik. ru.
Same problem as above, but also multiplied by the youth 's. Plus - this is one of the few authors who have not asked for a photo, and began to look for it myself. Picture is good, but not fresh.
Total, about 5 out of 10.
4 ). asasha. net.
Probably one of the best interviews. One of the few where I was able to say something new. Unfortunately, the author has not gotten rid of through- the same questions and the answers to them, who do not give interviews, but in the end and at all lost on the survey. Yet praise is not for nothing that there Mukhacheva first comments.
Total 8 of 10. It is worth noting that the author. And the author to try his luck in other interviews.
5 ). chaosline. ru.
Just bad, hastily cobbled together, not having even a normal interview format. Moreover, no one has tried to harmonize with me after answering the questions, and pictures, too, pull off some of the old post. The attempt to be ironic in no way adds humor and quality. Just did not work.
Total 3 of 10.
6 ). lifetiger. blogspot. com.
good interview. Many non-standard issues and attempt to get away from the questionnaires. But the more interesting answers out of questions and the conversation did not work equally. Maybe I Perlo, and maybe affected the lack of experience of the author, but what happened, it happened. I note from the author of a good potential.
Total 6 of 10.
7 ). ivanfisher. blogspot. com.
just an interview. No raisins. There is no mental pressure that should distinguish between the interviewer. In addition, it is worth read questions and answers and edit them. Mistakes did catch the eye and would cost to remove.
Total 4 of 10.
8 ). vpautine. com.
Good and sometimes very good questions. One feels that the person or intuitively, or been developed by another person's feelings and some questions come to the point. A more painful than the point at which the hit, so the higher tones and the level of openness is the answer. It is a measure of professionalism. In addition, it is probably one of the few interviews where the correspondence and clarifications were many times. That is the amount that has grown in quality.
Total 9 of 10.
9 ). webwm. net.
Likely, this interview would be the best, if not the character of the author. It is so hard the guy that all the time I was trying to prove something to his questions, which I diligently tried to fight back. Worthy of conversation, which can easily be approached for the type of television broadcasts matches. Yet we must be at least some fundamental. In any case, it must read. In such disputes can easily find the truth and the real nature of the characters.
Total 8 of 10.
10 ). other-life. com. ua.
Good, well made interview. But it is too impersonal. The same questions could ask anyone. Again, the main work was shifted to the corresponding. It should still learn a better companion, before asking him questions. Then ask in the comments are not about Lenovo on the pictures.
Total 5 of 10.
Summing up the results for myself, I first had a long interview for the Web, but the conversation with Alekseev hit me up and added a welter of interviews Asashe. But your comments in the previous post put everything in its place.
The first prize is a wide web. The author receives 1000 hryvnia transfer to your WMU Purse. People's Choice Award goes to 350 hryvnia Mountain optimizer. To claim the prize, you must contact me by mail, and so that you know.
---------------------------------.
Sign up. to update the blog with one click!. Read on Twitter!. ::. Advertising blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment